Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:34:08 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
        Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, devel@openvz.org,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/28] memcg: kmem controller charge/uncharge
 infrastructure
Message-ID: <20120530123406.GC25094@somewhere.redhat.com>
References: <1337951028-3427-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
 <1337951028-3427-17-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1337951028-3427-17-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 799
Lines: 24

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 05:03:36PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> +bool __mem_cgroup_new_kmem_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> +	struct page_cgroup *pc;
> +	bool ret = true;
> +	size_t size;
> +	struct task_struct *p;
> +
> +	if (!current->mm || in_interrupt())
> +		return true;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	p = rcu_dereference(current->mm->owner);
> +	memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(p);

So this takes the memcg of the group owner rather than the
task? I understand why we want this for user memory, but for
kernel?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/