Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754710Ab2E3Nxd (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2012 09:53:33 -0400 Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:47971 "EHLO mail-vb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754633Ab2E3Nxb (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2012 09:53:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 15:53:21 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , Greg Thelen , Suleiman Souhlal , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , devel@openvz.org, David Rientjes , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/28] memcg: kmem controller charge/uncharge infrastructure Message-ID: <20120530135319.GG25094@somewhere.redhat.com> References: <1337951028-3427-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1337951028-3427-17-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20120530130416.GD25094@somewhere.redhat.com> <4FC61B4E.2060206@parallels.com> <20120530133736.GF25094@somewhere.redhat.com> <4FC622B5.9080600@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FC622B5.9080600@parallels.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1097 Lines: 22 On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 05:37:57PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > On 05/30/2012 05:37 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > >Right. __mem_cgroup_get_kmem_cache() fetches the memcg of the owner > >and calls memcg_create_cache_enqueue() which does css_tryget(&memcg->css). > >After this tryget I think you're fine. And in-between you're safe against > >css_set removal due to rcu_read_lock(). > > > >I'm less clear with __mem_cgroup_new_kmem_page() though... > > That one does not get memcg->css but it does call mem_cgroup_get(), > that does prevent against the memcg structure being freed, which I > believe to be good enough. What if the owner calls cgroup_exit() between mem_cgroup_from_task() and mem_cgroup_get()? The css_set which contains the memcg gets freed. Also the reference on the memcg doesn't even prevent the css_set to be removed, does it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/