Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S319137AbSHMX0H>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 19:26:07 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S319154AbSHMXZB>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 19:25:01 -0400
Received: from stargazer.compendium-tech.com ([64.156.208.76]:21516 "EHLO
	stargazer.compendium.us") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S319097AbSHMXY1>; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 19:24:27 -0400
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kelsey Hudson <khudson@compendium.us>
X-X-Sender: khudson@betelgeuse.compendium-tech.com
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
cc: Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TUX in 2.4.20?
In-Reply-To: <200208131339.31547.roy@karlsbakk.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208131623210.2569-100000@betelgeuse.compendium-tech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 945
Lines: 25

On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

> hi all
> 
> perhaps it's time to ditch khttpd in favour for Tux now? I beleive 2.4.20 
> would be a nice time to do this.
> 
> anyone?

I tend to disagree; the purpose of having a "stable version" is that it's 
just that: stable. i.e. no new features, just bug fixes.

Of course, VM rewrites and the like are hardly bug fixes, per se, but 
they're not "new features" either.

 Kelsey Hudson                                       khudson@compendium.us
 Software Engineer/UNIX Systems Administrator
 Compendium Technologies, Inc                               (619) 725-0771
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/