Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:10:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:10:22 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:62660 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:10:21 -0400 To: Christian Reis cc: eepro100@scyld.com, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [NFS] General network slowness on SIS 530 with eepro100 References: <20020813212923.L2219@blackjesus.async.com.br> From: Trond Myklebust Date: 14 Aug 2002 03:13:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20020813212923.L2219@blackjesus.async.com.br> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1107 Lines: 22 >>>>> " " == Christian Reis writes: > Helle there, > I've been, for the past days, setting up a fairly big diskless > network based on Linux. I've chosen to use 2.4.19 as the kernel > because there were some hardware requirements, and for most of > the newer boxes, it runs fine. However, for three of the older > boxes, we have had some pretty odd performance and stability > issues. This message is about the latest one, which is an ASUS > P5S-B (has the infamous SIS 530 chipset) on an intel eepro100 > card. Details: Is all this NFS over UDP? If so, numbers should not really have changed in 2.4.19 ( - yes my patchset changes things, but stock 2.4.19 should not be too different w.r.t 2.4.18) Are you able to determine where in the 2.4.19-pre series the performance dies? Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/