Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:16:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:16:30 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:40907 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:16:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:20:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: Benjamin LaHaise cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , "H. Peter Anvin" , lkml Subject: Re: [patch] printk from userspace In-Reply-To: <20020814000727.C15947@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 942 Lines: 26 On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:11:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > It requires root. > > Still, unlike kernel code that can be rate limited, this call cannot. > Besides, isn't adding yet another syscall that's equivalent to write(2) > a reason to take this patch and burn it along with the vomit its caused? I have a better suggestion. How about we make write(2) on /dev/console to act as printk()? IOW, how about making _all_ writes to console show up in dmesg? Then we don't need anything special to do logging _and_ we get output of init scripts captured. For free. dmesg(8) would pick that up, klogd(8) will work as is, etc. Linus? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/