Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754493Ab2EaUmK (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2012 16:42:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9770 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751721Ab2EaUmI (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2012 16:42:08 -0400 Message-ID: <1338496905.2788.63.camel@ul30vt> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] intel-iommu: Make use of DMA quirks and ACS checks in IOMMU groups From: Alex Williamson To: Don Dutile Cc: joerg.roedel@amd.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, bhelgaas@google.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, aik@ozlabs.ru, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, liuj97@gmail.com Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 14:41:45 -0600 In-Reply-To: <4FC7CAE5.7020306@redhat.com> References: <20120530201424.31527.33142.stgit@bling.home> <20120530201942.31527.51604.stgit@bling.home> <4FC7CAE5.7020306@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2547 Lines: 69 On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 15:47 -0400, Don Dutile wrote: > On 05/30/2012 04:19 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > > Work around broken devices and adhere to ACS support when determining > > IOMMU grouping. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson > > --- > > > > drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c > > index 4a43452..ebf2b31 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c > > @@ -4090,6 +4090,14 @@ static int intel_iommu_domain_has_cap(struct iommu_domain *domain, > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static void swap_pci_ref(struct pci_dev **from, struct pci_dev *to) > > +{ > > + pci_dev_put(*from); > > + *from = to; > > +} > > + > > +#define REQ_ACS_FLAGS (PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_UF) > > + > > static int intel_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev) > > { > > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); > > @@ -4112,6 +4120,23 @@ static int intel_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev) > > } else > > dma_pdev = pci_dev_get(pdev); > > > > + swap_pci_ref(&dma_pdev, pci_get_dma_source(dma_pdev)); > > + > > + if (dma_pdev->multifunction&& > > + !pci_acs_enabled(dma_pdev, REQ_ACS_FLAGS)) > > + swap_pci_ref(&dma_pdev, > > + pci_get_slot(dma_pdev->bus, > > + PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dma_pdev->devfn), > > + 0))); > > + > > + while (!pci_is_root_bus(dma_pdev->bus)) { > > + if (pci_acs_path_enabled(dma_pdev->bus->self, > > + NULL, REQ_ACS_FLAGS)) > > + break; > > + > > + swap_pci_ref(&dma_pdev, pci_dev_get(dma_pdev->bus->self)); > > + } > > + > I'm having deja-vu on this patch.... > .... why not just make the above two patches as two functions in drivers/iommu/iommu.c, > one exported for these two modules (and maybe others someday...), e.g., iommu_pdev_put()) > which [intel-,amd-]iommu.c call ? Do we want to put PCI specific code in the IOMMU base code? I think we'd want to avoid that. I have no objection to reducing the duplication, but I'm not sure who else is going to use this, where to put it and what to call it. So, I left the duplication here so it might get more review from the IOMMU driver maintainers. Thanks, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/