Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:16:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:16:19 -0400 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([195.224.96.167]:8976 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:16:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:20:11 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: S390 vs S390x, was Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: [patch] kernel config 3/N - move sound into drivers/media Message-ID: <20020814132011.A13932@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20020814043558.GN761@cadcamlab.org> <20020814054945.GO761@cadcamlab.org> <200208141256.27680.arnd@bergmann-dalldorf.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200208141256.27680.arnd@bergmann-dalldorf.de>; from arnd@bergmann-dalldorf.de on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:56:27PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 756 Lines: 15 On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:56:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > It's not logical, but it tends to help because it's what's meant most > of the time. I don't know a single place in the kernel where you want > to test for (CONFIG_ARCH_S390 && !CONFIG_ARCH_S390X). BTW, ho much differences are between arch/s390 and arch/s390x? Is there any chance it could use the same #ifdef __LP64__ trick parisc uses for its 32 and 64bit versions? so far every file I've looked at was duplicated exactly in s390 and s390x. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/