Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759906Ab2FANt7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:49:59 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:42280 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759876Ab2FANt5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:49:57 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="173674086" Message-ID: <1338558820.2536.151.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: Remove useless marking of superblock dirty From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Ted Tso Cc: Linux Kernel Maling List , Linux FS Maling List , Ext4 Mailing List , Jan Kara Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:53:40 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1335775045.2584.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> References: <1333367140-28370-1-git-send-email-artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> <1333367140-28370-2-git-send-email-artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> <1334215249.13842.36.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <1335775045.2584.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ex1tRbia+Ilk+vJGeclS" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-3.fc16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2280 Lines: 62 --=-ex1tRbia+Ilk+vJGeclS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 11:37 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 10:20 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 14:45 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > From: Jan Kara > > >=20 > > > Commit a0375156 properly notes that superblock doesn't need to be mar= ked > > > as dirty when only number of free inodes / blocks / number of directo= ries > > > changes since that is recomputed on each mount anyway. However that c= omment > > > leaves some unnecessary markings as dirty in place. Remove these. > > >=20 > > > Artem: tested using xfstests for both journalled and non-journalled e= xt4. > >=20 > > Hi Ted, what would be the fate of this patch-set? >=20 > Hi Ted, I am sorry for being annoying, but what do you think about these > patches? Hi Ted, any chance for this stuff to hit 3.4? --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy --=-ex1tRbia+Ilk+vJGeclS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPyMlkAAoJECmIfjd9wqK0tEwP/2HWSuQXqbqhZu7Uc38FXQlS n3qQj2sheNRAA5pENczgiCoSqH/pF3iWYqxOQHwsmNnGetmT7FePrsknG07z72f2 K3vfN+wccfwKoBdLs3EyQzur8/ydHaE90gjAQHsMeRlAHprkfoMncBldXeqm8wAJ HS8OgyP6EEBV6/5lN+xeCspj3FGC5EPYOL0XyBt7bty4jWdCntUcM16h7N4HQ3kA 0UAj7KtyDu0t3mb6Pg6uTxD0YP1oyEan6KeziMDMk87s0K4LNgs5b7ewv5+plEXH J+zQ/LtyDJ6LLJ7KNMmc5425NQbCJzOP+uDNJEXL/z5avAzg8aGhPe94vfJ9BzWk kK6+1BjryyZG6qA9pOoG//3fJbcZ7tG4cRl0n/mDBkqzgp5zuEwfw62XgfBCZ5KS pz3+Hw2rYHk5F34bND+qCYV5CQL3E54DQeLUUneuoVNQgOSMqYZdkaD2OFrYCabs 6z4gLQRzTRyAKfMEYN9E9UIHtoFG9W8KTpMp3JNQe+EocQ8OKksG0wUFMRVNstil sqtov8fzlhS0fo0mM3j5rH+1wwHlLxGzqrnhC8uaseTeDSc7UWsXVDwIAoZjeIZ+ oXMM8GBXEM9+oYEmrsabaH5mttJsJ0AzkzUTWTxIs1W6y6YQpe2D9t9DeLb3Qt1L CFm2+G8E/3NMPv978VSC =zjXT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ex1tRbia+Ilk+vJGeclS-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/