Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933262Ab2FAOQ7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:16:59 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:39264 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932595Ab2FAOQ5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:16:57 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="147036859" From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Al Viro Cc: Linux FS Maling List , Linux Kernel Maling List , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/5] reiserfs: stop using write_supers and s_dirt Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:18:03 +0300 Message-Id: <1338560288-10727-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.7.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2167 Lines: 51 This patch-set makes reiserfs file-system stop using the VFS '->write_supers()' call-back and the '->s_dirt' superblock field because I plan to remove them once all users are gone. This patch-set makes reiserfs submit a delayed job for writing out old commits instead of using 's_dirt'. The goal is to get rid of the 'sync_supers()' kernel thread. This kernel thread wakes up every 5 seconds (by default) and calls '->write_super()' for all mounted file-systems. And the bad thing is that this is done even if all the superblocks are clean. Moreover, many file-systems do not even need this end they do not register the '->write_super()' method at all (e.g., btrfs). So 'sync_supers()' most often just generates useless wake-ups and wastes power. I am trying to make all file-systems independent of '->write_super()' and plan to remove 'sync_supers()' and '->write_super()' completely once there are no more users. The '->write_supers()' method is mostly used by baroque file-systems like hfs, udf, etc. Modern file-systems like btrfs and xfs do not use it. This justifies removing this stuff from VFS completely and make every FS self-manage own superblock. Al, in the past I was trying to upstream patches which optimized 'sync_super()', but you wanted me to kill it completely instead, which I am trying to do now, see http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/22/96 Tested using xfstests. ====== Overall status: 1. ext4: patches submitted, waiting for reply from Ted Ts'o: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/2/111 Ted keeps silence so far WRT the fate of this patch-set. 2. ext2: done, see commit f72cf5e223a28d3b3ea7dc9e40464fd534e359e8 3. vfat: done, see commit 78491189ddb6d84d4a4abae992ed891a236d0263 4. jffs2: sits the mtd subsystem tree, see commit 208b14e507c00ff7f108e1a388dd3d8cc805a443 in git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd.git TODO: affs, exofs, hfs, hfsplus, sysv, udf, ufs ====== Thanks, Artem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/