Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:25:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:25:28 -0400 Received: from cpe-66-1-218-52.fl.sprintbbd.net ([66.1.218.52]:34834 "EHLO daytona.compro.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:25:28 -0400 Message-ID: <3D5A5BB9.DEDEF97D@compro.net> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:31:37 -0400 From: Mark Hounschell Reply-To: markh@compro.net Organization: Compro Computer Svcs. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-lcrs i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: irqbalance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 601 Lines: 14 Will this prevent me from affinitizing irqs via the proc fs or prevent me from doing it from within a module? I tried an irqbalance patch for the p4's for 2.4.18 and it did in fact prevent me from doing this. This would be bad for those who use this irq affinitizing thing along with process affinity for real-time determinism improvements. Regards Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/