Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:43:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:43:50 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:55053 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:43:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:49:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Rik van Riel cc: Alan Cox , "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel , Matt Dobson Subject: Re: [PATCH] NUMA-Q disable irqbalance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 945 Lines: 25 On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > > As a clarification to this, I'm not suggesting that interactive > performance doesn't exist, I'm suggesting that we should measure > it. I think the only way to measure it is with a latency measurement thing - like the one used for some of the RT tuning. However, the latency measurement should not care too much about individual millisecond latencies, but only holler when it finds _combined_ bad latencies in the 1/10+ second range (which is human-perceptible). One problem is trying to find a good load for the tester program itself (it should not just sit in a tight loop, it should have a memory footprint and some delays of its own). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/