Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754784Ab2FCUxw (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:53:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50883 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754531Ab2FCUxv (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:53:51 -0400 Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 16:53:32 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Linus Torvalds , Hugh Dickins , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , Mel Gorman , Minchan Kim , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton , Cong Wang , Markus Trippelsdorf , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: WARNING: at mm/page-writeback.c:1990 __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x13a/0x170() Message-ID: <20120603205332.GA5412@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Hugh Dickins , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , Mel Gorman , Minchan Kim , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton , Cong Wang , Markus Trippelsdorf , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20120601023107.GA19445@redhat.com> <20120601161205.GA1918@redhat.com> <20120601171606.GA3794@redhat.com> <20120603181548.GA306@redhat.com> <20120603183139.GA1061@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120603183139.GA1061@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1139 Lines: 25 On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:31:39PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 11:23:29AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > > > Things aren't happy with that patch at all. > > > > Yeah, at this point I think we need to just revert the compaction changes. > > > > Guys, what's the minimal set of commits to revert? That clearly buggy > > "rescue_unmovable_pageblock()" function was introduced by commit > > 5ceb9ce6fe94, but is that actually involved with the particular bug? > > That commit seems to revert cleanly still, but is that sufficient or > > does it even matter? > > I'l rerun the test with that (and Hugh's last patch) backed out, and see > if that makes any difference. running just over two hours with that commit reverted with no obvious ill effects so far. Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/