Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:09:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:09:42 -0400 Received: from berzerk.gpcc.itd.umich.edu ([141.211.2.162]:14527 "EHLO berzerk.gpcc.itd.umich.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:09:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:13:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Kendrick M. Smith" X-X-Sender: kmsmith@mspacman.gpcc.itd.umich.edu To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Subject: Re: patch 01/38: switches in fs/Config.in, fs/Config.help Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1192 Lines: 31 >>>>> " " == Christoph Hellwig writes: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 06:55:35PM -0400, Kendrick M. Smith > wrote: >> This patch defines new switches in fs/Config.in - >> CONFIG_NFS_V4: enables nfsv4 client CONFIG_NFSD_V4: enables >> nfsv4 server CONFIG_SUNRPC_GSSD_CLNT: enables in-kernel client >> for GSSD > This should be the last patch after the code got in.. I agree, patch 1/38 should be renumbered to 38/38, and everything else shifted back by one. If I have to repost the patchset (e.g. after rediff to 2.5.32), I'll be sure to do this. In the meantime, patch 1/38 does not conflict with any of the others; the patches can be applied cleanly in the order 2,3,4,....,38, 1 Maybe we can just consider this to be the patch ordering for purposes of deciding which to apply to the 2.5.31 tree? This way I won't have to repost 200K of patches before 2.5.32 comes out... Thanks, Kendrick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/