Message-ID: <1338828989.7363.8.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: balance_cpu to consider other cpus in its group
 as target of (pinned) task migration
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Prashanth Nageshappa <prashanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, mingo@kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, roland@kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:56:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1338824014.28282.86.camel@twins>
References: <4FCC4E3B.4090209@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	 <1338801907.7356.163.camel@marge.simpson.net>
	 <1338810796.28282.32.camel@twins>
	 <1338814063.7356.192.camel@marge.simpson.net>
	 <20120604130740.GC25126@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	 <1338820234.7356.250.camel@marge.simpson.net>
	 <20120604143802.GB26651@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	 <1338820895.7356.252.camel@marge.simpson.net>
	 <20120604150040.GD25126@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	 <1338823271.28282.75.camel@twins>
	 <20120604152522.GE26651@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	 <1338824014.28282.86.camel@twins>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 578
Lines: 15

On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 17:33 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Now I'm not as opposed to this as Mike is, the load cpu_power thing can
> also happen due to excessive IRQ time, and hopefully we'll get to have
> an unpriv. SCHED_DEADLINE at some point as well.

I'm not heavily opposed, was just questioning the RT justification.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/