Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:31:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:31:26 -0400 Received: from mx01-a.netapp.com ([198.95.226.53]:28593 "EHLO mx01-a.netapp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:31:26 -0400 From: Brian Pawlowski Message-Id: <200208142234.g7EMYvQ21700@tooting-fe.eng> Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: Will NFSv4 be accepted? In-Reply-To: from Trond Myklebust at "Aug 15, 2 00:17:10 am" To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no (Trond Myklebust) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Cc: dax@gurulabs.com, torvalds@transmeta.com, kmsmith@umich.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME++ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 454 Lines: 12 > RPCSEC_GSS is not an argument for NFSv4... yes. But ACL support over the wire is an argument for V4 - and fine grained authorization coupled to strong authentication makes for a flexible security package. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/