Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:27:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:27:48 -0400 Received: from pc-62-30-255-50-az.blueyonder.co.uk ([62.30.255.50]:43227 "EHLO kushida.apsleyroad.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:27:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:31:19 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: David Lang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH Message-ID: <20020815003119.A27436@kushida.apsleyroad.org> References: <20020814204556.GA7440@alpha.home.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from david.lang@digitalinsight.com on Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 03:53:15PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 518 Lines: 13 David Lang wrote: > rather then debating how to convince gcc how to not optimize them away and > messing up the timing we should be talking about how to eliminate such > loops in the first place. You misunderstand. We _do_ want gcc to optimize away empty loops. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/