Message-ID: <4FCE3078.1030008@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:14:48 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
CC: khali@linux-fr.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de, ben-linux@fluff.org,
        olof@lixom.net, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] i2c: tegra: Bug fixes, cleanups and M_NOSTART support
References: <1338901800-23968-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>
In-Reply-To: <1338901800-23968-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1150
Lines: 27

On 06/05/2012 07:09 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> This patch series having the:
> - Handling of late register write due to Tegra PPSB design.
> - support for I2C_M_NOSTART
> - Use devm_* for all allocation.

The series,

Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>

Note that patch 4 touches context adjacent to Prashant's "i2c: tegra:
Add clk_prepare/clk_unprepare" patch, which I hope to take through the
Tegra tree since it's a requirement for the Tegra common clock
conversion. I don't think this will cause any significant conflict, but
perhaps it's worth resolving it explicitly.

Wolfram, perhaps we should put these 4 patches and Prashan'ts into their
own topic branch so that you can merge it into the I2C tree, and I can
merge it into the Tegra tree too? Or, I can take everything through
Tegra if you want, and ack it.

Laxman, do you expect any more I2C-related changes this kernel cycle?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/