Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754155Ab2FFAqJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:46:09 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:35945 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752491Ab2FFAqH (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:46:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:46:38 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Joe Perches Cc: Kay Sievers , Linus Torvalds , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Rework KERN_ Message-Id: <20120605174638.69bcfa31.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1338943205.11962.28.camel@joe2Laptop> References: <20120605142826.d92316a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1338934303.5780.8.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120605151754.a794ac7c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1338936572.5780.29.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120605162910.caccb0d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1338939316.11962.3.camel@joe2Laptop> <1338939792.11962.4.camel@joe2Laptop> <1338940345.11962.9.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120605165808.cd255b93.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1338941247.11962.16.camel@joe2Laptop> <1338941971.11962.20.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120605173751.65a2e1ee.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1338943205.11962.28.camel@joe2Laptop> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1266 Lines: 37 On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:40:05 -0700 Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 17:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:07:27 -0700 Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 16:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > echo "\0014Hello Joe" > /dev/kmsg > > > > > > # echo -e "\x014Hello Me" > /dev/kmsg > > > gives: > > > 12,778,4057982669;Hello Me > > > > That's changed behavior. > > Which is an improvement too. No it isn't. It exposes internal kernel implementation details in random weird inexplicable ways. It doesn't seem at all important though. > I very much doubt a single app will change > because of this. I doubt it as well. > > printk_emit() does parse the leading \0014, and then skips over it, > > removing it from the output stream. printk_emit() then throws away the > > resulting level because devkmsg_writev() did not pass in level==-1. > > I'm glad you know how it works now. It's nice to see you learning about it as well. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/