Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:05:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:05:31 -0400 Received: from dsl-65-186-160-165.telocity.com ([65.186.160.165]:19730 "EHLO pumpkin.fieldses.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:05:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:07:13 -0400 To: Dax Kelson Cc: Alan Cox , "Kendrick M. Smith" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nfs@lists.sourceforge.net" , beepy@netapp.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: Will NFSv4 be accepted? Message-ID: <20020815040713.GA18419@fieldses.org> References: <1029375327.28240.35.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 884 Lines: 19 On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 07:51:56PM -0600, Dax Kelson wrote: > Right, I do understand that Kerberized/GSS NFS is not exclusive to NFSv4. > However, right now, there is only one way to get Kerberized NFS. The CITI > NFSv4 patches. > > Those patches are, in their estimation, ready for inclusion. NFSv3 > support is "coming down the pipeline". The minimal NFSv4 patches which Kendrick has submitted are ready for inclusion, but those do not include rpcsec_gss support. The only patches which include rpcsec_gss support are patches against 2.4.18, and they aren't in good enough shape yet, though we hope they will be soon! --Bruce F. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/