Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 02:14:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 02:14:54 -0400 Received: from citi.umich.edu ([141.211.92.141]:51334 "HELO citi.umich.edu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 02:14:54 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 02:18:48 -0400 From: marius aamodt eriksen To: Alan Cox Cc: Brian Pawlowski , Trond Myklebust , dax@gurulabs.com, Linus Torvalds , kmsmith@umich.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: Will NFSv4 be accepted? Message-ID: <20020815061848.GA9122@umich.edu> Reply-To: marius@citi.umich.edu References: <200208142234.g7EMYvQ21700@tooting-fe.eng> <1029373829.28240.16.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1029373829.28240.16.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 916 Lines: 23 * Alan Cox [020814 21:13]: > On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 23:34, Brian Pawlowski wrote: > > But ACL support over the wire is an argument for V4 - and fine grained > > authorization coupled to strong authentication makes for a flexible > > security package. > > ACL works in NFSv2 and nicely in NFSv3 - again the problems Linux has > are the client failing to respect basic NFS rules of operation. there is no over-the-wire specification for sending or receving ACLs on NFSv{2,3} - hence the server may choose to obey them, but an arbitrary client cannot set them, or view them. marius. -- > marius@umich.edu > http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/marius - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/