Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 02:19:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 02:19:38 -0400 Received: from citi.umich.edu ([141.211.92.141]:63267 "HELO citi.umich.edu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 02:19:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 02:23:32 -0400 From: marius aamodt eriksen To: Brian Pawlowski Cc: Trond Myklebust , dax@gurulabs.com, torvalds@transmeta.com, kmsmith@umich.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: Will NFSv4 be accepted? Message-ID: <20020815062332.GB9122@umich.edu> Reply-To: marius@citi.umich.edu References: <200208142234.g7EMYvQ21700@tooting-fe.eng> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208142234.g7EMYvQ21700@tooting-fe.eng> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 879 Lines: 24 * Brian Pawlowski [020814 18:36]: > > RPCSEC_GSS is not an argument for NFSv4... > > yes. > > But ACL support over the wire is an argument for V4 - and fine grained > authorization coupled to strong authentication makes for a flexible > security package. and let's not forget such things as getting rid of the representation of users as UIDs over the wire, as well as delegations (i.e. better caching == better performance), named (extended) attributes support, soon-to-come interoperability with a vast array of operating systems, etc. etc. marius. -- > marius@umich.edu > http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/marius - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/