Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:06:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:06:53 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:26619 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:06:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: Will NFSv4 be accepted? From: Alan Cox To: marius@citi.umich.edu Cc: Brian Pawlowski , Trond Myklebust , dax@gurulabs.com, Linus Torvalds , kmsmith@umich.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20020815061848.GA9122@umich.edu> References: <200208142234.g7EMYvQ21700@tooting-fe.eng> <1029373829.28240.16.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020815061848.GA9122@umich.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 15 Aug 2002 12:08:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1029409707.29812.7.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 727 Lines: 17 On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 07:18, marius aamodt eriksen wrote: > > ACL works in NFSv2 and nicely in NFSv3 - again the problems Linux has > > are the client failing to respect basic NFS rules of operation. > > there is no over-the-wire specification for sending or receving ACLs > on NFSv{2,3} - hence the server may choose to obey them, but an > arbitrary client cannot set them, or view them. If you are trying to argue that NFSv4 handles ACL's better you are preaching to the choir - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/