Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758061Ab2FFT6U (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:58:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8233 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751257Ab2FFT6T (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:58:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 22:58:15 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Jason Wang , netdev@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: fix a race on 32bit arches Message-ID: <20120606195814.GA20677@redhat.com> References: <1338971724.2760.3913.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1338972341.2760.3944.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120606111357.GA15070@redhat.com> <1338988210.2760.4485.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120606144941.GA17092@redhat.com> <20120606081432.6b602065@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20120606185107.GA20503@redhat.com> <1339012441.26966.48.camel@edumazet-glaptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1339012441.26966.48.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1128 Lines: 35 On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 09:54:01PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 21:51 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > BTW for cards that do implement the counters in software, > > under xmit lock, is anything wrong with simply taking the xmit lock > > when we get the stats instead of the per-cpu trick + seqlock? > > > > I still dont understand why you would do that. > > Most modern machines are 64bits, so there is no seqlock overhead, > nothing at all. > > If you focus on 32bit hardware, just stick on 32bit counters ? These wrap around. > Note that most u64_stats_sync users are virtual drivers, without xmit > lock (LLTX drivers) > > Absolutely, I am talking about virtio here. I'm not kicking u64_stats_sync idea I am just saying that simple locking would work for virtio and might be better as it gives us a way to get counters atomically. -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/