Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758297Ab2FFU2h (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:28:37 -0400 Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:39265 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753811Ab2FFU2f (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:28:35 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6734"; a="198444092" Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 13:28:33 -0700 From: David Brown To: Rajendra Nayak Cc: David Collins , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Supporting non-device tree consumers with device tree regulator drivers Message-ID: <20120606202833.GA11202@codeaurora.org> References: <4FCE30D6.7060102@codeaurora.org> <4FCEE5DA.7090403@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FCEE5DA.7090403@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1454 Lines: 30 On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:38:42AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > On Tuesday 05 June 2012 09:46 PM, David Collins wrote: > >In the long term, this problem should go away of its own accord. However, > >in the short term, many systems are converting over to using device tree. > > Therefore, we are left with a situation currently where some regulator > >consumer drivers are being probed via device tree and some are being > >probed via board file devices within a single platform. > > Is this a situation you are facing in your mainline kernel or internal > trees? What you explain would need you to work with hybrid board files > with some devices created through device tree and some others statically > from the board file in the kernel, and that approach was already shot > down as unacceptable. As I understand, this is something being done on our internal kernel. I don't think this really applies to the mainline kernel, since none of these transitionary drivers are going into the upstream kernel without being made to work with device tree. Thanks, David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/