Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757827Ab2FFUnn (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:43:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58157 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751500Ab2FFUnm (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:43:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 23:43:35 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Ben Hutchings Cc: Eric Dumazet , Stephen Hemminger , Jason Wang , netdev@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: fix a race on 32bit arches Message-ID: <20120606204335.GA23552@redhat.com> References: <20120606111357.GA15070@redhat.com> <1338988210.2760.4485.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120606144941.GA17092@redhat.com> <20120606081432.6b602065@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20120606185107.GA20503@redhat.com> <1339012441.26966.48.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120606195814.GA20677@redhat.com> <1339013289.26966.62.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120606201620.GA23358@redhat.com> <1339014904.2836.56.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1339014904.2836.56.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1480 Lines: 38 On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 09:35:04PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 23:16 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:08:09PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 22:58 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > > Absolutely, I am talking about virtio here. I'm not kicking > > > > u64_stats_sync idea I am just saying that simple locking > > > > would work for virtio and might be better as it > > > > gives us a way to get counters atomically. > > > > > > Which lock do you own in the RX path ? > > > > We can just disable napi, everything is updated from napi callback. > > Seriously, though: don't do that; this is going to hurt performance for > minimal benefit. > > Ben. Yea, it doesn't work anyway. Maybe take a xmit lock for tx and keep using the per-cpu counters for rx. Or does this sound too disruptive too? > > > You'll have to add a lock in fast path. This sounds really a bad choice > > > to me. > > > > .ndo_get_stats64 is not data path though, is it? > > > > -- > Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare > Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. > They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/