Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754664Ab2FGBTr (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:19:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60414 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751724Ab2FGBTq (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:19:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:19:15 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Al Viro , Linux Kernel , Miklos Szeredi , Jan Kara , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: processes hung after sys_renameat, and 'missing' processes Message-ID: <20120607011915.GA17566@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Al Viro , Linux Kernel , Miklos Szeredi , Jan Kara , Peter Zijlstra References: <20120603231709.GP30000@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120603232820.GQ30000@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120606194233.GA1537@redhat.com> <20120606230040.GA18089@redhat.com> <20120606235403.GC30000@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120607002914.GB22223@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2315 Lines: 54 On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:42:35PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So Al meant you to test mutex_is_locked(dentry->d_inode->i_mutex) of > the parents. ok, I ended up with.. WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&target->d_parent->d_inode->i_mutex)); if (dentry->d_parent != NULL) WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex)); but.. > And I'd suggest making it just a WARN_ON_ONCE(), because if you make > it a BUG_ON() and it triggers, your system will likely be dead. And > ONCE is all that matters - it should never happen. I hit the second WARN very early on, before I even get out of the initramfs. [ 6.365556] WARNING: at fs/dcache.c:2350 d_move+0xaf/0xc0() [ 6.365793] Modules linked in: [ 6.365909] Pid: 134, comm: mount Not tainted 3.5.0-rc1+ #69 [ 6.366030] Call Trace: [ 6.366147] [] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 6.366271] [] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 6.366396] [] d_move+0xaf/0xc0 [ 6.366521] [] vfs_rename+0x3c4/0x4e0 [ 6.366647] [] sys_renameat+0x201/0x230 [ 6.366773] [] ? debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x16c/0x210 [ 6.366902] [] ? vm_munmap+0x5c/0x80 [ 6.367026] [] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x50 [ 6.367148] [] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x50 [ 6.367273] [] ? sub_preempt_count+0x79/0xd0 [ 6.367397] [] ? sysret_check+0x1b/0x56 [ 6.367521] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x115/0x1a0 [ 6.367647] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [ 6.367772] [] sys_rename+0x1b/0x20 [ 6.367891] [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Did I screw up the test again ? I'm feeling a bit hard-of-thinking tonight. > > To be clear, do you want me to try that with or without the reverts ? > > I think either would be interesting. For now, I still have those two commits applied. Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/