Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760294Ab2FGJHY (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 05:07:24 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:64532 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760214Ab2FGJHT (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 05:07:19 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="154117777" Message-ID: <1339060265.6875.91.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Roland Stigge , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, kevin.wells@nxp.com, srinivas.bakki@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, hechtb@googlemail.com, lars@metafoo.de, b32955@freescale.com, leiwen@marvell.com Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:11:05 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20120607081108.GO8262@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1338974414-5308-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <1338989921.6875.50.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120607081108.GO8262@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HlyRmc8aspg0NFDOi0CL" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-3.fc16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1942 Lines: 54 --=-HlyRmc8aspg0NFDOi0CL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 09:11 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:38:41PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 11:20 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > > > +#else > > > +#define lpc32xx_nand_resume NULL > > > +#define lpc32xx_nand_suspend NULL > > > +#endif > >=20 > > 0, not NULL. >=20 > Err, what planet are you on there. These are _pointers_ to functions, > so using a _pointer_ is more correct than using an _integer_. Yes, thanks, I was wrong.=20 --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy --=-HlyRmc8aspg0NFDOi0CL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJP0HApAAoJECmIfjd9wqK04RsQAI8lnLfEntn0nSK+pohXkzd4 Ea56RZe6g+mSUVieRq1g2L1BlbhRQ6KL3HByWSeFCrTwJOsy2crRJz8EuMc6meh5 u7eTmGjUP0mS2GK0W6serb2iwe/e5QC2WWXFoIYwhnekwoT7n90M9Pk7prcmGXos IIoDpv7WMcbGBb6KJO9BwoBWg8d+S36+ddvlXgVmGGdEzFyXc33tEzx/KNjG7lEH Y/h6CSwNw6LS9iVURkQ8wY+l34xk/U6uRHlBVP64xSGcTEpMAnBMnz687oBfMNAo BsH3US4VVDPVT3qaZI/vyJohBi9Xf3+qF9RKaqYSa7l/n6ezHI1kNbkvHFxdxNr9 1x1u7ers7fN83ruyn5jlW+4fUTjXLe4ChlJdXQTNUxttO3AWHZF+9ltzBfxgg6O2 J1FP01ZSZTUb8ti1fHhnJ4eVP8Vi9RVR0eG7uvRXN7eDInz5lAuMrJ23zfAWua4j 2yLXSG4XskclVuoHvnnqQ9HxNP/0C5jAuPWh320sT3231+Bf6vMz5/SbN56EhOYP vMPnjsWCnNXuytGf4lT+0L3JlJRLp3wH+Z/a8xgPFbOMGkTRDX5ocoQ/bITmiXH5 D00aF+H25mNC6SV8uAD8usY97BkorZcTfbctbl9rMZfk6GkeKr+VnHyYPP359DCP w7ItUxvXp8zRIFQbm3NW =+9MT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HlyRmc8aspg0NFDOi0CL-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/