Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933146Ab2FGWDD (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:03:03 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:50400 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933040Ab2FGWDA (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:03:00 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="153147216" Message-ID: <4FD12512.1010005@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:02:58 -0700 From: Jeff Kirsher Reply-To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, rkagan@parallels.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com, carolyn.wyborny@intel.com, donald.c.skidmore@intel.com, gregory.v.rose@intel.com, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, john.ronciak@intel.com, dnelson@redhat.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000: save skb counts in TX to avoid cache misses References: <4FD11F49.5060805@gmail.com> <20120607.144358.1732928576389957779.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20120607.144358.1732928576389957779.davem@davemloft.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig038063C610A34E6E1F72D3E7" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2354 Lines: 56 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig038063C610A34E6E1F72D3E7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/07/2012 02:43 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Jeff Kirsher > Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:38:17 -0700 > >> Thanks! I have applied the patch to my queue > Why? > > My impression is that this is a patch already in the tree, and it's > being submitted for -stable but such minor performance hacks are > absolutely not appropriate for -stable submission. I did not catch that Roman was trying to get this into stable because there was no mention of what stable kernels this was applicable back to (and the fact that it was a performance). I thought he had found an issue with the previous commits and was suggesting a fix to the previous patches. Since he is trying to get this into -stable, disregard my statement about adding it to my tree. --------------enig038063C610A34E6E1F72D3E7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJP0SUSAAoJEOVv75VaS+3OSDsP/3oAiEaOuT5bmKZz3LA4kPOL 5jFtTeHccAGz9d2gKVCuN4D+9jHmCj7SslZNRAMncKaEVsoRbo5sMpkucjLBF6xg nQTRNIMRh/MGSlG2Cw+T4h9Ci+rXmP4FtrJs2At7jE+9j5dFI3OefNoeP68boivt 2RQ1EbjCFYizwTNY+B5V2tOSwIJf/lmAUTAdyYBP7iS9ybVlrHmlQ8Yi7v6sze2P oNflAJclfniixhlb6WBvN+p5HaQpxtAJZxIGUwPBKBX/5hSn5kJT88dqClPWx8LP XltYtLHzyOE69Ic/7ngfXfOawCt+SFzt2Wl9vqQ7cWKAG2gCy5B8ki5G4N0GCb2b vME3sNGL/XRS+64CAoPdbuS+9gSo/ZRQvlDTF2FC5ZsHHmd4jogQQJPyktT11wHg TsKykz6o0hx0Gi3eF/7XSfqEG2FibKStFYTv53G7s9GmonlO8VjSxVPRTkG7trX+ u+KCFb13KAVp1vhmVMbiQeNlpXkcy9LFp3cJJ30+11lxO26IB6avTtsDFFPRcB5M PYcvFPcdjNmUP7eb6TsN7KxmTJy8+NWxhlX4H2+nLILXEEhkZsvkkCQdh8L2xzdC Ko547FeSIYtwIDL+RChfNde7DQ/F9UdEMUH02QDt7svSD0wZH55Dn5mi8ob4lcRW ICow6BS8OCtB2nJNma0M =XJMR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig038063C610A34E6E1F72D3E7-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/