Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759792Ab2FHBSw (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:18:52 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:50505 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759714Ab2FHBSu (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:18:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120608010520.GA25317@x4> References: <20120607212114.E4F5AA02F8@akpm.mtv.corp.google.com> <20120608010520.GA25317@x4> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:18:28 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gePQ48rRoQPwHrOw6Vbd9HhBO98 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 12/12] mm: correctly synchronize rss-counters at exit/exec To: Markus Trippelsdorf Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , khlebnikov@openvz.org, hughd@google.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, oleg@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1528 Lines: 38 On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > You've somehow merged the wrong patch. > The correct version can be found here: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133848759505805 It looks like Andrew sent me a bad version. However, that patch you point at isn't good *either*. It does totally insane things in xacct_add_tsk(). You can't call "sync_mm_rss(mm)" on somebody elses mm, yet that is exactly what it does (and you can't pass in another thread pointer either, since the whole point of the per-thread counters is that they don't have locking and aren't atomic, so you can't read them from any other context than "current"). The thing is, the *only* point where it makes sense to sync the rss pointers is when you detach the mm from the current thread. And possibly at "fork()" time, *before* you duplicate the "struct task_struct" and pollute the new one with stale rss counter values from the old one. So doing sync_mm_rss() in xacct_add_tsk() is crazy. Doing it *anywhere* where mm is not clearly "current->mm" is wrong. If there is a "get_task_mm()" or similar nearby, it's wrong, it's crap, and it shouldn't be done. Oleg, please rescue me? Your patch looks much closer to sane, but it's not quite there.. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/