Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757577Ab2FHDcQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 23:32:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45940 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752062Ab2FHDcO (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 23:32:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4FD1728E.20802@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:33:34 +0800 From: Jason Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120210 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Hutchings CC: Rick Jones , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com Subject: Re: [V2 RFC net-next PATCH 2/2] virtio_net: export more statistics through ethtool References: <20120606075208.29081.75284.stgit@amd-6168-8-1.englab.nay.redhat.com> <20120606075217.29081.30713.stgit@amd-6168-8-1.englab.nay.redhat.com> <1339089306.2770.10.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> <20120607.130512.219951433412203999.davem@davemloft.net> <1339100649.2770.20.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> <4FD11194.2040405@hp.com> <1339102567.2770.25.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> In-Reply-To: <1339102567.2770.25.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1726 Lines: 47 On 06/08/2012 04:56 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 13:39 -0700, Rick Jones wrote: >> On 06/07/2012 01:24 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 13:05 -0700, David Miller wrote: >>>> From: Ben Hutchings >>>> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:15:06 +0100 >>>> >>>>> I would really like to see some sort of convention for presenting >>>>> per-queue statistics through ethtool. At the moment we have a complete >>>>> mess of different formats: >>>> Indeed. Probably ${QUEUE_TYPE}-${INDEX}-${STATISTIC} is best. >>>> With an agreed upon list of queue types such as "rx", "tx", "rxtx" >>>> etc. >>> I think we should leave the type names open-ended, as there are other >>> useful groupings like per-virtual-port. In that case the separator >>> should be chosen to allow arbitrary type names without ambiguity. >> So you mean like something along the lines of the presence of say '.' >> indicating indent a level: >> >> rx_bytes: 1234 >> myqueue1.rx_bytes: 234 >> myqueue2.rx_bytes: 345 >> ... > Most drivers seem to want this sort of ordering/grouping: > > group0.foo > group0.bar > ... > group1.foo > group1.bar > ... > > but if we have a standard way of indicating groups of statistics then > the user can choose whether they want to reorder by type name. > > Ben. > Yes, it looks to me that the per-queue satistics were better: - Simple and less synchronization. - Good for future virtio-net multiqueue merging. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/