Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760672Ab2FHWb0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:31:26 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:35134 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754730Ab2FHWbW (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:31:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:31:20 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Al Viro Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Linus Torvalds , Boaz Harrosh , Tao Ma , Nick Piggin , "Dmitry V. Levin" , v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, codalist@TELEMANN.coda.cs.cmu.edu, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, osd-dev@open-osd.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, logfs@logfs.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH, RESEND] fs: push rcu_barrier() from deactivate_locked_super() to filesystems Message-Id: <20120608153120.b722d7c3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120608222734.GT30000@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1339191663-17693-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20120608150253.e42464a6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20120608221446.GA18250@otc-wbsnb-06> <20120608152550.258d6a30.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20120608222734.GT30000@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 888 Lines: 21 On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 23:27:34 +0100 Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:25:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > A neater implementation might be to add a kmem_cache* argument to > > unregister_filesystem(). If that is non-NULL, unregister_filesystem() > > does the rcu_barrier() and destroys the cache. That way we get to > > delete (rather than add) a bunch of code from all filesystems and new > > and out-of-tree filesystems cannot forget to perform the rcu_barrier(). > > There's often enough more than one cache, so that one is no-go. kmem_cache** ;) Which filesystems have multiple inode caches? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/