Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753072Ab2FIWZq (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:25:46 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:32784 "EHLO mail-qc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751968Ab2FIWZo (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:25:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4FD3CD6A.9020801@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:25:46 -0400 From: KOSAKI Motohiro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Rientjes CC: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov , Dave Jones , Hugh Dickins , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Srikar Dronamraju , KOSAKI Motohiro , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Anton Arapov , Masami Hiramatsu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com Subject: Re: [patch for-3.5-rc1] mm, oom: fix badness score underflow References: <20120607165942.GA31966@redhat.com> <20120608140328.GA26650@redhat.com> <20120608142625.GC1711@redhat.com> <20120608150437.GA31091@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2160 Lines: 54 (6/8/12 4:21 PM), David Rientjes wrote: > If the privileges given to root threads (3% of allowable memory) or a > negative value of /proc/pid/oom_score_adj happen to exceed the amount of > rss of a thread, its badness score overflows as a result of a7f638f999ff > ("mm, oom: normalize oom scores to oom_score_adj scale only for > userspace"). > > Fix this by making the type signed and return 1, meaning the thread is > still eligible for kill, if the value is negative. > > Reported-by: Dave Jones > Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes > --- > mm/oom_kill.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c > --- a/mm/oom_kill.c > +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c > @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct task_struct *p, > unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, > const nodemask_t *nodemask, unsigned long totalpages) > { > - unsigned long points; > + long points; > > if (oom_unkillable_task(p, memcg, nodemask)) > return 0; > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, > * Never return 0 for an eligible task regardless of the root bonus and > * oom_score_adj (oom_score_adj can't be OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN here). > */ > - return points ? points : 1; > + return points> 0 ? points : 1; > } Use long long. following line is dangerous. points += p->signal->oom_score_adj * totalpages / 1000; maximum oom_score_adj is 1000. then if system has >8G memory on 32bit (i.e. LONG_MAX [pages] * 4096 [pagesize] / 1000), it might get an overflow. Or, don't use normalized oom_score_adj. i.e, oom_score_adj_write() convert oom_score_adj into rss based modifier. This is oom-killer code. A micro optimization don't bring us a performance benefit. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/