Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756418Ab2FJLVW (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:21:22 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:61326 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756294Ab2FJLVT (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:21:19 -0400 Message-ID: <4FD48317.50706@ontolinux.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:20:55 +0200 From: Christian Stroetmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.0; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marco Stornelli CC: Linux FS Devel , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] pramfs: persistent and protected RAM filesystem References: <4FD46521.5070900@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FD46521.5070900@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:f0GWA7yIeZJUnXtCZ7gIOm+vX44NfEPENhPB8jbwWch LtiEl7YBYbKf/aRc39njh3+4e7P0sNGiIcO+91y7qLEWt/MXQZ ZHINm7PqUrtqxc7wbU1QcREuA4q8xDGNzyJVRFuMIy0PytIOEK 3vKDTu6X/MIGsxmiUrGkqg4F5ZD/L32zW9cLdJEWBTAz7R3Iwi 89e/teYGbyL4XmeF478rcNqYwg06DUR/7kvsNIFRCSli+loFRp 2PIhc4xVlBCvTbVU8PuY+FdzJydejCyvU+gzaxfdNz7kCaLkSH wBpIhfkKBi3smBM1s/+ceWfUsr0L4/L4EyHZaKQBTPTi/Eqbn2 7h4IHg6nHGisT+R5OAlE= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1932 Lines: 49 On Sun, June 10, 2012 Marco Stornelli wrote: > Hi all, > > after the merge of pramfs in the LTSI kernel and after the "hot topic" > NVM Mapping API, here a new submission of pramfs code. Even if the > code won't be in mainline the review is really useful to me, so any > comment is welcome. Hello I think we have here two cases: 1. "A block of non-volatile RAM separate for normal system memory", [documentation Pramfs] and 2. The whole RAM is non-volatile and so the whole situation is changed, and an NVM Mapping API is needed and "hotly" discussed. For 1. your solution is a very good concept that is getting around issues solely related with specific optimizations for disc-based file systems, like the 2 problems described in the documentation of Pramfs, but for 2. there is no need for a file system anymore, as we use it today while working with a computer system, because data needs not to be written to a file system at all, and so the file system will become something like a backup system in the most common use cases of a computing device, if I should describe it a little bit too provocative. In this case your approach taken to handle the 2 problems mentioned in the documentation of Pramfs would have to be driven further by focusing more on the management of the RAM, the power, and the long-term data storage (backup) for harmonizing Pramfs with them. A further point is to make Pramfs bootable, if this not already possible somehow. > > > The patch series is based on 3.5-rc2. > > Pramfs documentation: > > http://pramfs.sourceforge.net > > Git repo: > > git://pramfs.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pramfs/pramfs > > Marco Have fun Christian Stroetmann -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/