Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 05:32:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 05:32:38 -0400 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:21776 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 05:32:38 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 02:27:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Andre Hedrick To: Petr Vandrovec cc: Mikael Pettersson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.31 boot failure on pdc20267 In-Reply-To: <2298DFF575E@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 700 Lines: 24 On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > Yes. If you'll look at d1510r0c.pdf from ATA guys, you'll find that BUZZIT! That is an totally new transport protocol and if you research the pci device class you would know that it has nothing to do with the problem. If you guys are playing with ADMA on DMA Hosts, oh my! The context of what is the EOT between the two HOST protocols has no meaning. Regards, Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/