Subject: Re: net: nfc: BUG and panic in accept() on 3.5-rc2
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        lauro.venancio@openbossa.org, aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org,
        Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1339426241.4999.62.camel@lappy>
References: <1339423241.4999.53.camel@lappy>
	 <20120611144134.GX22557@sortiz-mobl>
	 <1339425693.6001.2268.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	 <1339426241.4999.62.camel@lappy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:58:46 +0200
Message-ID: <1339426726.6001.2309.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 970
Lines: 26

On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 16:50 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:

> Eric, Is there something that documents at what state each of the
> callbacks in the network subsystem can be called? Like a big flow chart
> of some sorts?
> 
> I'm asking because I've looked at this as well before sending this mail,
> and while the fix does look trivial, I wasn't sure whether it is really
> the correct fix, or the problem is that this callback wasn't supposed be
> called at all so something else is broken (we had such issue with
> namespaces and unshare() not long ago).
> 

I am not aware of such 'document'.

Things change, and only *good* reference is actual source code.

Now, take a look at sock_graft()/sock_orphan()/inet_release() ...


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/