Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:12:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:12:57 -0400 Received: from nick.dcs.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.88.61]:6826 "EHLO nick") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:12:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:17:35 +0100 (BST) From: Matt Bernstein To: Alan Cox cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GA-7DX+ crashes In-Reply-To: <1029328539.26226.19.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: X-URL: http://www.theBachChoir.org.uk/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Auth-User: mb X-uvscan-result: clean (17fg28-0003c8-00) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1138 Lines: 26 On Aug 14 Alan Cox wrote: >On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 13:12, Matt Bernstein wrote: >> We're very much at a loss as to why the 60 new PCs we've bought largely >> don't run Linux (various 2.4 kernels including 2.4.19, limbo1-BOOT) for >> very long without crashing. One of them seems to work OK; its /proc/pci is >> identical, but the batch number on the southbridge seems one lower--is >> this dodgy VIA hardware again? We'll be trying a different IDE controller >> next, but 60 of those ain't cheap.. > >My immediate assumption would be a batch of bad hardware or faulty bios The former seems to be the case, after talking to Gigbayte. (We got Windows to crash much more spectacularly after stressing it a little harder--that gets the company who sold them to us to come over personally :) Thanks very much--hopefully our dual-boot lab will continue to exist for the next academic year! Matt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/