Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:19:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:19:35 -0400 Received: from pc-62-30-255-50-az.blueyonder.co.uk ([62.30.255.50]:226 "EHLO kushida.apsleyroad.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:19:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:21:33 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Dan Kegel Cc: suparna@in.ibm.com, Benjamin LaHaise , Andrea Arcangeli , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , Chris Friesen , Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org Subject: Re: aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)] Message-ID: <20020816152133.B590@kushida.apsleyroad.org> References: <1028223041.14865.80.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020801140112.G21032@redhat.com> <20020815235459.GG14394@dualathlon.random> <20020815214225.H29874@redhat.com> <20020816150945.A1832@in.ibm.com> <3D5D0186.7B7724BC@kegel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3D5D0186.7B7724BC@kegel.com>; from dank@kegel.com on Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:43:34AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 537 Lines: 14 Dan Kegel wrote: > You can actually consider posix AIO using sigtimedwait() to pick up > completion notices to fit the definition of completion port if you > squint a bit. ... with the bonus that it fits comfortably into a sigtimedwait() loop that's waiting for non-AIO things too. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/