Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754871Ab2FMWVy (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:21:54 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:39466 "EHLO mail-vc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753229Ab2FMWVv (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:21:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1338576911-17089-1-git-send-email-merez@codeaurora.org> <1338576911-17089-2-git-send-email-merez@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:21:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mmc: block: Add write packing control From: Muthu Kumar To: merez@codeaurora.org Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, DOCUMENTATION , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2230 Lines: 57 On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:52 PM, wrote: > > On Mon, June 11, 2012 5:28 pm, Muthu Kumar wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Muthu Kumar wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Maya Erez wrote: >>>> trigger >>>> the packing can be configured via sysfs by writing the required value >>>> to: >>>> /sys/block//num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing. >>>> The trigger for disabling the write packing is fetching a read request. >>>> >>> >>> If it is applicable only to MMC why do we have this sysfs attr for all >>> block devices? >> >> Just to be clear, please create a directory, say mmc, under >> /sys/block// and create the attr inside that. >> >> You can refer to dm (dm-sysfs.c) for sample implementation. > I understand why you think it would be best to distinguish the MMC > specific attribute from the general block devices attributes. > However, since this attribute is created only for the MMC block device, > other block devices won't be aware of it. I understand its created by the MMC code so will not be there for other block devices. But having the device specific attributes inside one directory is better/cleaner. And since we are already following that model for other devices, why not follow that for MMC also? > Therefore, it doesn't > necessarily require a separation to a different folder. > Currently there is another MMC specific attribute (force_ro) which is also > created in the root directory. I think it would be better to also create > the num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing in the same folder as force_ro and not > make it an exceptional attribute in its location and the code that handles > it. Then time to move that as well to "mmc" directory. Regards, Muthu > I would appreciate your opinion on that. > > Thanks, > Maya > -- > Sent by consultant of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/