Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754889Ab2FNBWV (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:22:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39783 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751357Ab2FNBWU (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:22:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:22:09 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Fengguang Wu Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: xfs ip->i_lock: inconsistent {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} -> {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} usage Message-ID: <20120614012209.GM3019@devil.redhat.com> References: <20120612012134.GA7706@localhost> <20120613123932.GA1445@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120613123932.GA1445@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 643 Lines: 20 On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:39:32PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Christoph, Dave, > > I got this lockdep warning on XFS when running the xfs tests: BTW, Fengguang, can you report XFS things to the xfs@oss.sgi.com list rather than LKML? I only noticed this because of the CC, but I pay much closer attention to the XFS list than I do LKML... Thanks, Dave. -- Dave Chinner dchinner@redhat.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/