Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:54:30 +0530
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] uprobes: don't use loff_t for the valid virtual
	address
Message-ID: <20120614052430.GA9089@in.ibm.com>
Reply-To: ananth@in.ibm.com
References: <20120613184933.GA13870@redhat.com> <20120613185106.GE13878@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120613185106.GE13878@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 949
Lines: 26

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:51:06PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> loff_t looks confusing when it is used for the virtual address.
> Change map_info and install_breakpoint/remove_breakpoint paths
> to use "unsigned long".
> 
> The patch doesn't change vma_address(), it can't return "long"
> because it is used to verify the mapping. But probably this
> needs some cleanups too.

Oleg,

As you mentioned in another email, this conflicts with my [1/2]
preparatory patch for the powerpc port. Do you think it just makes sense
to make the arch_uprobe_analyze_insn() prototype change to take vaddr as
part of this set itself?

I will then rebase the powerpc port when this goes into an upstream
tree.

Ananth

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/