Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755511Ab2FNJzC (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 05:55:02 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:58806 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755115Ab2FNJzA (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 05:55:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:56:17 +0200 From: Daniel Vetter To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: ignore pipe select bit when checking for LVDS register initialization Message-ID: <20120614095617.GA4797@phenom.ffwll.local> Mail-Followup-To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20120613162544.GJ4829@phenom.ffwll.local> <1339613218-4699-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <20120613194614.GP4829@phenom.ffwll.local> <20120613202600.GA3761@thinkpad-t410> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120613202600.GA3761@thinkpad-t410> X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 3.4.0-rc3+ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1910 Lines: 38 On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:26:00PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:46:15PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 01:46:58PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > > > The Lenovo Thinkpad T410 has the LVDS_PIPEB_SELECT bit set in the LVDS > > > register when booted with the lid closed, even though the LVDS hasn't > > > really been initialized. Ignore this bit so that the VBT value will be > > > used instead. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee > > Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. Chris had some reservations about > > the sanity of this patch, but given that it works around bios-insanity I'm > > gonna just take this chance to stab myself with lvds-machines blowing up > > left and right ;-) > > Let's hope that doesn't happen ;) > > I do find myself wondering though whether it might be better to prefer > the value from the VBT whenever there's one available, and only rely on > the actual register value as a fallback, since the bios can't be trusted > to initialize the register. I'm pretty ignorant about all this graphics > stuff though; I assume there's a reason it isn't done this way? The usual reasoning is that if it's in the register, it's the value that makes something show up on the screen and hence has a higher change of being right. Yep, BIOS routinely store total garbage in vbt (or the newer OpRegion) and somehow fix that up when copying things to the hw :( Obviously there's also the other case where the hw values aren't set up, in which case we try to try to fall back to vbt values. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/