Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:16:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:16:53 -0400 Received: from host194.steeleye.com ([216.33.1.194]:8205 "EHLO pogo.mtv1.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:16:51 -0400 Message-Id: <200208171720.g7HHKim03809@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Gabriel Paubert cc: Ingo Molnar , James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Boot failure in 2.5.31 BK with new TLS patch In-Reply-To: Message from Gabriel Paubert of "Sat, 17 Aug 2002 19:09:26 +0200." <3D5E8346.5010101@iram.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 12:20:44 -0500 From: James Bottomley X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 750 Lines: 18 paubert@iram.es said: > Hey no, it's cpu_gdt_table that must be aligned. That one does not > matter, it's only used once for the lgdt instruction... Actually, the intel manual recommends (but doesn't require) a wierd alignment for the descriptors. It recommends aligning them at an address which is 2 MOD 4 to avoid possible alignment check faults in user mode. Not that I think we can ever run into the problem, but we should probably obey the recommendation. I'll fix this up as well. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/