Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:56:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:56:07 -0400 Received: from wotug.org ([194.106.52.201]:59706 "EHLO gatemaster.ivimey.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:56:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:57:43 +0100 (BST) From: Ruth Ivimey-Cook X-X-Sender: ruthc@sharra.ivimey.org To: Andre Hedrick cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IDE? IDE-TNG driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1094 Lines: 37 On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote: > >ide_ioctl(fd, HDIO_SET_IDE_SCSI, bool) Seems fine to me... >Where bool does the subdriver switch. >Just that ioctl's are being blasted and people using are frowned upon. ? so how is cdrecord (or whatever) supposed to do its stuff -- is it ioctl() -> fcntl()? If so, I suppose that's ok, but the basic premise still exists, surely? >This was a feature Alan Cox poked me for to try and move away from how >modules are basically an all or nothing grab-all. I don't think modules are the answer to any of this: a) some people want basically module-less kernels b) in some environments, you need to be able to select the IO mechanism without the ability to select the module to load. anyway... Ruth -- Ruth Ivimey-Cook Software engineer and technical writer. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/