Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752875Ab2FOLLN (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:11:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:42587 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751466Ab2FOLLM (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:11:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1339478463-31172-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> References: <1339478463-31172-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:11:12 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression" From: Cong Wang To: Cong Wang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Dave Young , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Yinghai Lu , Takashi Iwai Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 571 Lines: 19 On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > > Takashi, could you help to test if the S4 regression is still > there after this patch? Hello, Any comments? I have tested this revert on my laptop, with running simple "suspend and resume" test for several times, I didn't see any problem. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/