Message-ID: <4FDB8382.8090501@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:48:34 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
        Fedora Kernel Team <kernel-team@fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: missing leap second patches in stable.
References: <20120615152007.GA11793@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120615152007.GA11793@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 852
Lines: 23

On 06/15/2012 08:20 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> Should these be in -stable ? Looks like all the other recent changes
> in that area are present.  With the leap second just two weeks away,
> it seems like they should be.
>
> Looks like 6b43ae8a619d17c4935c3320d2ef9e92bdeed05d is in 3.4-stable,
> (haven't checked earlier -stable trees).

So the second patch has been sent out for stable review as of yesterday. 
So it should be on its way, but you're right that I forgot to CC stable 
on the first TAI offset fix.

I'll generate the patch and send it to Greg.  Thanks for the close 
review here!

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/