Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755922Ab2FPIw7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jun 2012 04:52:59 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:43821 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751208Ab2FPIw4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jun 2012 04:52:56 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 10:52:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Yinghai Lu cc: Ulrich Drepper , Bjorn Helgaas , jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , lenb@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SNB PCI root information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 865 Lines: 27 On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Yinghai Lu wrote: > We used to have same for intel IOH nehalem, and get bless from intel. > but that get removed at some point. Why so? > I have one local internal similar patch for SNB iio for crossing check > if BIOS set correctly. > but I don't think i will try to get blessing from intel to publish it. Why do you need Intels blessing to post a useful patch? Is that patch based on public available documentation and/or your own findings? If yes, then hell we don't care whether Intel likes it or not. If not, then the question arises what Intel has to hide in that area. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/