MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+i8gKKDdsG95GFkPskH1fZHBw8oMGu+4DW84Xq1-mLzzgFbrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJd=RBB1s-_VOtoDsBbLidS51HwW6e98p=U-4mL-spByUMvETw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+i8gKKQyGBc-BNBJ72S6rq7aiFqS=onqWQyeY4P+VVvFCeXJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJd=RBA=mvMGQgdKgW26dgd8nK2-_dW_epQLwbjOo2Zx2gsbeg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+i8gK+H-hm9bjJub4siH0pCdOrzRxJXaX2QjosnKCjeWYPt4A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJd=RBBxnD7JirPpy-jTgE9kpnZXN6gkTMsgcG8=goZxgQfTaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+i8gKLrd4JUf5P=zkj4x_yYc-kk2kjA-0To9e7iRNbZcCpLxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJd=RBCa_JfHO-=HiGqz_13CaHj5KGE5-EYAYT3jd+FPofqybw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJd=RBC7r+a8Q6XvQX5-=0h2d5==tOjyG1HY_1q6=gfBwbWtFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+i8gKKDdsG95GFkPskH1fZHBw8oMGu+4DW84Xq1-mLzzgFbrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:32:34 +0800
Message-ID: <CAJd=RBD2Ss1vfugZcZzA5CzRPapBJsmx7tAxijBmOgQ9tjC7cw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] BFS 420: a tiny step forward
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
To: Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@t-online.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1487
Lines: 40

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Hillf,
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Emmanuel
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, the issue is still there.
>>>>
>>> Hang at same place?
>>>
>> And try to revert handling CPU_ONLINE, please.
>>
>>
>> --- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c        Sat Jun  2 17:30:28 2012
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c        Thu Jun  7 20:58:36 2012
>> @@ -5352,7 +5352,7 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
>>                /* Update our root-domain */
>>                grq_lock_irqsave(&flags);
>>                if (rq->rd) {
>> -                       BUG_ON(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
>> +                       BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
>>
>>                        set_rq_online(rq);
>>                }
>> --
>
> Sorry for the late reply. This patch did solve the issue, thanks.
>
Thank you, Emmanuel.
It is good news before 421-1 is released next week:)

		Hillf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/