Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 18 Aug 2002 13:16:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 18 Aug 2002 13:16:43 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:4622 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 18 Aug 2002 13:16:42 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] (0/4) Entropy accounting fixes From: Robert Love To: Oliver Xymoron Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <20020818171831.GT21643@waste.org> References: <20020818021522.GA21643@waste.org> <20020818042818.GG21643@waste.org> <1029689668.903.19.camel@phantasy> <20020818171831.GT21643@waste.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 18 Aug 2002 13:20:41 -0400 Message-Id: <1029691241.903.40.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 866 Lines: 23 On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 13:18, Oliver Xymoron wrote: > I'm thinking of changing urandom read to avoid pulling entropy from > the primary pool (via xfer) if it falls below a given low > watermark. The important part is to prevent starvation of > /dev/random, it doesn't have to be fair. A watermark (perhaps /proc configurable) is a very sane way of doing this. Great. > My patches should provide sufficient entropy for any workstation use > with or without network sampling. It's only the headless case that's > problematic - see my compromise patch with trust_pct. Sounds good to me, so we shall see... Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/