Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 18 Aug 2002 22:02:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 18 Aug 2002 22:02:21 -0400 Received: from 12-231-243-94.client.attbi.com ([12.231.243.94]:15886 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 18 Aug 2002 22:02:21 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 19:01:25 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Olivier Galibert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: devfs Message-ID: <20020819020125.GA20296@kroah.com> References: <1029709596.3331.32.camel@psuedomode> <20020818210618.A1806@zalem.puupuu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020818210618.A1806@zalem.puupuu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.21 (i586) Reply-By: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 00:51:56 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 699 Lines: 19 On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 09:06:18PM -0400, Olivier Galibert wrote: > > I've been wondering, imagine that in the future we have a working > dynamic device filesystem (be it devfs, driverfs, whatever) nice > enough that we don't want a disk-based /dev anymore. How are we > supposed to mount it so that the kernel's open("/dev/console") > succeeds? initramfs might already contain a minimial /dev that has those kinds of entries in it. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/