Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 00:36:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 00:36:02 -0400 Received: from pa13.bydgoszcz.sdi.tpnet.pl ([213.25.7.13]:18954 "HELO pa13.bydgoszcz.sdi.tpnet.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 00:36:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 06:39:41 +0200 From: "Tomasz Torcz, BG" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.4 and full ipv6 - will it happen? Message-ID: <20020819043941.GA31158@irc.pl> Mail-Followup-To: "Tomasz Torcz, BG" , linux-kernel@vger.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1192 Lines: 24 Some time ago Linux was first OS to have full RFC complaint IPv4 stack. Linux still has superior networking, but protocol of the future is IPv6. IPv6 stack in mainline is currently far from perfect. There is a hope, however. Full IPv6 stack is beeing mantained by USAGI project. It's clear, that USAGI's project will be integrated into mainline kernel. What worries me - it's planned for 2.7, what is _BAD_ and late. IMO, it can be included in any time. The sooner is better. Marcelo - would you include full IPv6 stack in 2.4.20 if you get patches? Please - it's important for Linux to be network OS choice in future. It's barely possible with current IPv6 implementation. My another concern is that Linux on Sparc machines is very unstable, and main polish 6bone router - beeing a sparc machine - is not very reliable. But that's another story. -- Tomasz Torcz Zjadanie martwych dzieci zdzichu@irc.pl jest barbarzynstwem! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/